Last week, Orlando Pride drew 23,403 supporters to their NWSL opener. But Jeff Plush isnt resting on his laurels he wants to make womens soccer even bigger

The scenes in Orlando last weekend were what womens soccer fans for a long time couldve only dreamed about. The Orlando Pride, a team that didnt even exist weeks ago, attracted 23,403 paying customers to watch them play soccer.

Jeff Plush, the commissioner of the National Womens Soccer League, was there, and no one wouldve blamed him if he treated it as a victory lap for the NWSLs short history. With Orlandos roaring arrival as a booming new market, the NWSL has hit benchmarks that past leagues in the US and abroad never could.

But hitting those benchmarks and hosting a record-setting crowd isnt enough. In the success of one club, Plush sees work ahead to help all the leagues clubs achieve the same.

Seeing what transpired in Orlando gives us a lot excitement, but also a lot of ambition. Theres so much more that we can achieve if we do it in unison, Plush told the Guardian. It means theres a lot more to achieve together. This isnt the time to feel like weve arrived its the time to re-double our efforts.

If the past proves anything, it may be that a dogged, relentless mindset is necessary if the NWSL wants to continue the growth it has enjoyed over three years. Attendance is up, expansion talks are as strong as ever and the league continues to attract better talent and yet the NWSL hardly seems to have hit its stride. With a bare-bones staff of three and a front office tucked inside US Soccers headquarters, its very much in its infancy.

So where does the NWSL go from here? The goal for 2016 is the same as always, Plush said: keep building fan bases and raising attendance. But more today than ever before, there are many different pieces to get there.

MLS expansion

If clubs around Major League Soccer werent already looking at the NWSL, Orlando surely changed that. The feedback on Orlandos immediate success has been widespread and positive and some of that feedback has come from MLS clubs that are interested in following suit and joining the NWSL, Plush said.

Don Garber, the commissioner of MLS, forecasted last week a mass influx of MLS clubs into the NWSL. That, of course, would be good news for the NWSL, where the top three teams in attendance are the leagues three only MLS-affiliated clubs. The Portland Thorns, owned by the Timbers, were profitable immediately and have shared profits with the NWSL.

I think as the womens game gets more and more popular, it just makes sense for teams that have the infrastructure to add NWSL teams, Garber said at an annual conference of sports journalists. I think youll see, very soon, half of our clubs launching and managing womens teams. When and how and what the specifics are, I dont know.

Plush, who previously served as managing director for the Colorado Rapids, told the Guardian he talks to Garber frequently, but they havent spoken specifically about MLS clubs expanding into the NWSL. Asked if a formal partnership between MLS and NWSL could be on the horizon, Plush said its not something hes considered.

I dont think it would need to be formal. Thats the great thing about the soccer business: you have a lot of people rooting for each others success, he said. Ive talked to clubs in MLS and clubs looking to get into MLS they almost always reach out to us as well, trying to learn and understand the landscape and where we fit within it. So, even if nothing formal, theres really good open dialogue.

Raising standards

Expansion has been good to the NWSL.The Houston Dash and the Orlando Pride, the leagues only two expansion teams, are already two of the leagues most successful clubs, and more expansion could bring more success.

But there is plenty of growing for the league to do without expansion.

Expansion is really important, but we also need our 10 clubs operating to the best of their ability and creating memorable experiences for fans, Plush said.

For the seven clubs in the league that are not affiliated with an MLS club and lack a large-scale organizational infrastructure, its easier said than done.

Its been a difficult question for clubs around the NWSL: who is the ideal womens soccer fan, and how do you market to them? As much as attendance differs throughout the NWSL, so does the marketing approach from club to club and the resources available.

A league marketing committee meets weekly with the goal of finding successful strategies for each city, Plush said. The league uses those meetings to assist clubs, but there are no plans to intervene in markets that are struggling. Rather, Plush talks about growth as something that will come if the leagues clubs can band together.

Its a reality of business generally and sports business: theres always going to be markets that are at the top of the attendance ledger, and some that arent, he said. The whole goal is to get everyone to grow.

The media footprint

The NWSL announced before the season that Fox Sports would again would air a handful of matches toward the end of the season. It was essentially the same TV deal as last year, but the Fox deal is not exclusive and the league is in talks to make games available through other media partners, which could include online platforms like ESPN3, which announced a deal with USL last week.

But the NWSL is also willing to look outside the box. Orlando Pride forward Alex Morgan, one of the most marketable female soccer players in the world, streamed the broadcast of the Prides home-opener on her Facebook page through the social networking sites new live broadcast feature. It was the first time Facebook ever livestreamed a professional sports broadcast.

Though Facebook interprets a view loosely, its a good bet that Morgans broadcast reached an audience of US national team fans who havent followed the NWSL. The second half of the match garnered more than 361,000 views.

Sometimes we just need to try things and do things that are fun and create an opportunity for our fans to consume our product in a different way, Plush said. Those are the types of things that show we need to maybe take a little more risk and be willing to try some things.

The demographic who enjoys our sport, I think theyll respect a little bit of risk knowing were trying to make the product better and more available.

The US Soccer lawsuits

With the NWSLs recent growth and the 2016 season off to a successful start, the looming news item that could throw a wrinkle into the leagues grand plans is a back-and-forth legal dispute between US Soccer and the US womens national team.

Though the NWSL isnt specifically at the heart of the disagreements, the labor contract in dispute requires that US Soccer subsidize the salaries of national team players who compete in the NWSL. For clubs, that eases the financial burden of paying player salaries and helps them attract stars like Alex Morgan. But a new collective bargaining agreement with higher national team salaries for players, which is what they are asking for, could change NWSL compensation.

Asked if the lawsuits worried him, Plush denied they were on his mind as his looks at the leagues future. He was with the Rapids while MLS went through a contentious round of collective bargaining negotiations with players that eventually were resolved, he added.

It will run its course and theyll come to an agreement, he said. How it gets there is frankly none of my business. Were not privy to it. We have to do our job on a daily basis.

Expansion talks have not slowed down in light of the recent legal jostling either, he added. Many ownerships groups have expressed interest and the NWSLs clubs plan to discuss expansion at their May board meeting.

Plush wouldnt comment on conversations with US Soccer or the players involved in the legal action, but added: Its just not our situation to worry about.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/30/nwsl-womens-soccer-orlando-pride-jeff-plush

Its great news that the feminist dystopian novel will be adapted into a TV series. But why tell progressive stories onscreen if we cant learn from them?

Margaret Atwoods feminist dystopian classic The Handmaids Tale is on its way to a series adaptation Hulu in charge, Atwood consulting, and Elisabeth Moss starring as the titular handmaid Offred.

This is exciting news: with womens rights crises all over the world, there has never been a better time to dig into one of the 20th centurys defining criticisms of misogyny, inequality, and the denial of female agency, with a 31-year-old story that holds up painfully well.

Theres just one problem: this promising feminist vehicle will be helmed by a white man.

No offense to Bruce Miller, the announced showrunner, writer and executive producer. His resume includes a number of excellent and underrated science fiction shows, and he seems to have done a swell job with them. Plenty of white male showrunners have done right by non-white, non-male narratives in the past: Gene Roddenberry (Star Trek), Chris Carter (The X-Files), and Glen Larson and Ronald Moore (the Battlestar Galactica reboot) have all contributed enormously to the portrayal of complex female and minority protagonists on television. The effects those characters have had on millions of lives, mine included, cannot be understated.

But The Handmaids Tale is no space western. Its not a government conspiracy thriller with a supernatural tinge. It is an extremely specific critique of white, heterosexual society dominated by men, and the ways that that system objectifies and disenfranchises women and nonbinary people.

In the Republic of Gilead, a United States transformed overnight by a religious military coup, that patriarchy takes the form of a totalitarian government that determines the value and role of every woman according to fertility and class: all non-male bodies are sorted according to their use to rich white men. Not unlike slaveowners, these men vary in degrees of magnanimity. But at the end of the day, these women are still property two-legged wombs, as Offred puts it. They are still things to be used. And the fact that Hulu has put a white man in charge of telling this story, for the benefit of a corporation, is so deeply ironic it would be hilarious if it werent so disturbing.

It wont matter if Miller hires only women to work on the series; that would be great, but it doesnt change the fact that at the end of the day, all of them would answer to a white man, however benevolent. And isnt that the exact problem The Handmaids Tale seeks to address? Why tell dystopian stories if not to learn something from them? If we cant learn from them, dont they become just another vehicle with which to say, At least things arent as bad as that in real life?

No spoilers here, but they are.

Atwood herself has explained many times that the novel is not a prediction for the future at all the circumstances she describes have all actually happened, and continue to this day. Women are reminded every time a new law is passed making it impossible for us to access abortion clinics, obtain contraceptives, fight domestic abuse or support our children. Were reminded of it when were paid less than our male peers, when bosses say we should be more helpful, and when complete strangers insist that harassment is flattery. Yet this fact seems to have been overlooked, in the most basic and symbolic sense, in the decision to retell this story.

Times have changed since men created Dana Scully and Lieutenant Nyota Uhura. The public is screaming for more diversity in Hollywood, on both sides of the camera, and white men are no longer the only people making movies and television. It is no longer thought progressive for men to portray experiences that are explicitly not their own onscreen; sometimes, its even a liability not to entrust those people to tell their own stories. Half of all film school graduates are women, and at the premier program of the University of Southern California, more than half of its film programs students are not white. This has already been explained countless times, in extremely specific detail, with appalling amounts of hard data. Representation is a huge issue in Hollywood as it is outside it if you want to tell stories that criticize inequality, you ought to start by putting your own backyard in order.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/apr/30/the-handmaids-tale-hulu-tv-series-margaret-atwood-women

The Obama administration is facing pressure from Congress to release a secret Reagan-era memo allegedly used to this day to shield a slew of executive actions and regulations from congressional scrutiny.

At issue is a 1983 memorandum of understanding (MOU) that permits the Treasury Department to escape a review of economic costs and benefits when it comes to IRS rules.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, says this has helped the administration pursue a range of unilateral changes and he wants the memo made public.

This non-public MOU between the Treasury and White House further cloaks the regulatory process in secrecy and decreases regulatory transparency at a time when the Executive Branch is attempting to achieve a great deal of policy through regulatory measures generally and tax regulations specifically, Hatch wrote to Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew.

In the letter, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee argued the memo has been used by the Executive Branch to skirt congressional scrutiny for changes on everything from corporate taxes to ObamaCare. Committee sources told FoxNews.com the memo is a loophole being abused in order to reduce transparency.

According to Hatch, the 1983 guidance generally allows IRS rules to get around whats known as the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

Under that law, Congress typically has the authority to review and rescind major federal regulations — those with an annual economic impact of $100 million or more. If a rule is listed as non-major, the cost-benefit analysis is not required.

Heres the rub: The 1983 memo, according to Hatch, generally describes IRS rules as not major.

This may have helped smooth the way for major regulations. In fact, neither the Employee Individual Health Care Mandate nor the Employee Health Care Mandate was listed as major by the administration or agencies.

Hatch said, given the sheer number of regulations, more scrutiny is needed by Congress. In his letter, he cited as an example a rule that controls the type of font companies can use for the word turkey when marketing turkey ham.

But it is larger issues that are of real concern. Committee sources note the memo takes on new importance in light of a host of new regulations issued by the Treasury Department aimed at tackling corporate inversions.

Hatch said he recognized why the IRS would want to issue new rules without undue interference from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), but those justifications do not allay his concerns.

The letter was first reported by The Washington Times.

Sam Batkins, director of regulatory policy with the conservative American Action Forum (run by former Congressional Budget Office head Doug Holtz-Eakin), said the memo may have been originally used to let the IRS make ministerial changes to tax law that occur annually.

If you were to tell the average person that the Congress has not been able to vote on any major tax proposed by the administration, I think they would be very surprised, Batkins said.

The office learned of the memo through correspondence between the committee and the administration.

The Treasury Department has until May 12 to respond. A representative with the department did not respond to a FoxNews.com request for comment. 

Fox News’ Mike Emanuel contributed to this report. 

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/04/29/senator-seeks-secret-memo-used-as-loophole-for-obama-regs.html