Posts By: DWMG

A wolf, a cat or a tiger? Russians to vote on World Cup mascot

by -

(CNN)With all the headlines surrounding the ongoing FIFA scandal, it’s easy to forget that in less than two years Russia will play host to its first World Cup Finals.

But as of this week, Russia 2018 organizers are reminding the world of exactly that, beginning with a cute marketing campaign designed to anoint the tournament’s mascot.
    As part of a televised event on October 21, Russians will choose which of three finalists — a crafty cat, a space-traveling tiger, or a goggle-wearing wolf — will bear the honor of being its World Cup 2018 mascot.
    The competition began last year, when Russian design students submitted their entries based on 10 character descriptions formulated by an open survey. The tiger, cat and wolf were shortlisted by a jury panel, before allowing the public to vote online.
    The colorful trio were unveiled as one of the highlights of the annual Circle of Light Moscow International Festival this week, with online polls opening up shortly afterward.
    Although the World Cup Finals date back Uruguay in 1930, mascots were not introduced until a lion known as “World Cup Willie” became the face of the England 1966 tournament.
    Since then, the 12 other World Cup mascots have included everything from an orange (Spain 1982), to a jalapeo pepper (Mexico 1986), to a three-banded armadillo (Brazil 2014).

    Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/24/football/russia-2018-fifa-world-cup-mascot-campaign/index.html

    Elephant In The Room, Edison Becomes One Of Ohio’s Statues On Capitol Hill

    by -

    From left, Ohio House of Representatives Speaker Cliff Rosenberger, House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wis., House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky., applaud during the unveiling of the statue of Thomas Edison in Statuary Hall on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2016. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

    The elephant in the room, is, well, in this case, the elephant in the room.

    The room in question is National Statuary Hall, the old House chamber in the U.S. Capitol. The elephant is a dead circus pachyderm named Topsy. And the question centers on a loose connection between Topsy and the latest addition to the Capitols statuary collection: Thomas Alva Edison.

    Known as the The Wizard of Menlo Park, historians credit Edison with developing the light bulb, the phonograph, the stock ticker and a camera to shoot movies. His prolific inventions earned Edison nearly 1,100 U.S. patents. And in a ceremony this week, congressional leaders dedicated the new Edison statue, representing Ohio.

    When I heard we were unveiling a statue of Thomas Edison, my first thought was We dont have one already? House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said at the statue convocation.

    Although Edison is closely associated with New Jersey, he was a native of Milan, Ohio. Congress permits each state to send two statues each to Capitol Hill. After years of debate, Ohio elected to scrap the statute of obscure Ohio Gov. William Allen (a vocal critic of Abraham Lincoln) in favor of someone else. Compared to other notable Ohioans, history simply bypassed Allen.

    Ohio considered a robust catalogue of luminaries for representation at the capitol. During his remarks at the ceremony, Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio,  mentioned Neil Armstrong and 23 other astronauts. He discussed Ohios eight presidents — though a statue of President James Garfield already graces the Capitol Rotunda.

    We also had a couple of guys named Orville and Wilbur who were in the running, Portman said. So this was not easy.

    Ohio also considered Harriet Beecher Stowe. Jesse Owens. Even Barberton, Ohio native Bo Schembechler who became the legendary University of Michigan football coach.

    Ahem.

    Did someone really think they could hornswoggle Ohio into letting the University of Michigan football coach represent the Buckeye State in the U.S. Capitol for time immemorial?

    Were a state with a lot to be proud of. But I think we got it right, said Portman of Ohio settling on Edison.

    In the statue, Edison stands tall, proudly hoisting in his right hand toward the sky what is thought to be his most prominent invention: the incandescent light bulb.

    More than 20 inventors engineered versions of incandescent lamps prior to Edison. But Edison perfected the bulb and coupled the idea of a singular lamp to a system of lighting an entire room or street.

    Of course, a matrix of lamps requires power. Historians believe Edison rose above his rivals by connecting the incandescent bulb with the development of mass power generation and distribution systems.

    This brings us to what is known as the War of Currents.

    A race ensued in the late 19th Century between Edison, George Westinghouse and Nikola Tesla to electrify the world.

    Tesla crafted something called an induction motor, which helped boost the use of alternating current (AC.) But Edison preferred direct current (DC.)

    In 1885, Tesla came to work for Edison with the opportunity to redesign his direct current generators.

    Tesla says Edison offered him $50,000 for the gig, though Edison didnt have that sort of cash. Tesla completed the task, and Edison never coughed up the $50,000. Edison offered Tesla a significant raise, telling him you dont understand our American humor.

    Tesla quit on the spot and went back to perfecting his alternating current system.

    Edison saw the advantages of alternating current power but was reluctant to switch. It was expensive. Plus, Edison didnt want to torpedo his DC work and lose out to Westinghouse and Tesla.

    So what do you do if youre working with Edison? Demonstrate that AC isnt safe.

    Edisons team tried to taint AC and its development by Tesla to reveal its dangers.

    Edison loyalists helped supply New York an electric chair system that ran on AC. Edison opposed capital punishment himself. But by making sure the device used Westinghouse generators, Edison thought he might scare people into never wanting AC brought into their home or business if it was used in the first execution via electric chair.

    News reports characterized the exercise as grotesque. Reporters described horrific stenches, burning bone and singed flesh.

    They would have done better using an ax, declared Westinghouse of the gruesome affair.

    In other words, Edisons team played Westinghouse and Tesla. Edisons aides managed to orchestrate a well-publicized event to sully the reputations of his rivals and turn the public against the use of AC.

    This is where Topsy the elephant comes in.

    Topsy was a performer in the Forepaugh Circus and wound up at Coney Island in New York in 1903. There was a plan to execute Topsy for a variety of violent incidents. Edisons movie cameras were on hand to film Topsys execution in another highly-publicized episode to demonstrate the problems with AC.

    Edison didnt appear at Topsys execution. And theres nothing that directly links Edison to the film company or the power industry at that point. But news accounts of the time said Topsy was electrocuted by electricians of the Edison Power Company.

    The film was also credited on screen to Thomas A. Edison.

    But it didnt matter. Alternating current killed Topsy. And if AC is really so powerful to fell an elephant, shouldnt people consider something else like direct current?

    The 74-second Electrocuting an Elephant was one of the first films available for the public to watch on Edisons kinetescopes, a device he crafted to show the earliest movies.

    Edison may have a statue in the U.S. Capitol today. But since the mid-1950s, power companies distribute most electricity via alternating current rather than Edisons direct current.

    But who do we think of when it comes to power? Edison, not Tesla. After all, the power company in the New York region is known as ConEdison, not ConTesla.

    The brand Westinghouse certainly remains in the vernacular of the American consumer. But theres no statue of George Westinghouse at the U.S. Capitol. And there certainly isnt a statue of Nikola Tesla on Capitol Hill, either.

    Edison clearly possessed better marketing. Despite Edisons minimal involvement, PR disasters for alternating current with the electric chair and Topsy helped propel his electricity inventions to the forefront at the time, leaving rivals behind.

    The Sacramento-based, 1980s hair band Tesla indirectly helped propel Nikola Tesla back into the public consciousness as it opened for acts like David Lee Roth and Def Leppard. Elon Musks Tesla Motors didnt hurt either. However, in a bizarre twist, it was Edison who invented the first electric car battery. Tesla is virtually synonymous today with electric vehicles.

    The focal point of the Capitols Edison statue is unquestionably the incandescent light bulb he thrusts above his head. The light bulb is symbolic. Its as if to say Edisons gotten another idea. Come up with a new invention. Developed a new device.

    The statute by artist Alan Cottrill virtually declares Let there be light!

    The light of ideas, invention and progress.

    Of course the bulb Edisons statue wields is an incandescent one — like the ones he perfected.

    But in 2007, Congress passed a law mandating the phase-out of incandescent light bulbs in favor of fluorescent ones. Brazil, the European Union, Canada and a host of other countries also voted to ban incandescent bulbs, too.

    And who developed the first practical fluorescent bulb? Nikola Tesla.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/24/elephant-in-room-edison-becomes-one-ohios-statues-on-capitol-hill.html

    ‘The Magnificent Seven’ misfires in remaking classic western

    by -

    (CNN)The title and outline might be the same, but “The Magnificent Seven” has been put on steroids — blown up and lobotomized for an audience weaned on the “Fast & Furious” movies, not westerns.

    Granted, the title has demonstrated itself to be durable. The 1960 classic (itself adapted from “The Seven Samurai”) spawned three sequels, a TV series and even inspired an outer-space knockoff, “Battle Beyond the Stars.”
    Still, this new version — directed by Antoine Fuqua, who reunites with his “Training Day” stars Denzel Washington and Ethan Hawke — has made one choice after another that strips the movie of any subtlety, all building toward a climax that ups the carnage to almost absurd levels.
      The basic plot still involves a small town of farmers (somewhere called Rose Creek, nowhere near Mexico) enlisting a septet of tough, heavily outnumbered hombres to take on a very bad man (Peter Sarsgaard) and his minions. Only here, the heavy is a mining magnate determined to oust them from the town, creating no option but to flee or fight.
      Similarly, the script (by “True Detective’s” Nic Pizzolatto and Richard Wenk) has omitted what motivated the original group to undertake what looked to be a suicide mission — namely, that the age of the gunfighter was coming to an end, meaning they were all living on borrowed time.
      Instead, the movie has substituted a half-baked revenge plot for their leader, Sam Chisolm (Washington), who goes about assembling the team and girding for battle against not just 40 bandits, but a veritable army.
      As for the recruits, the other headliner is the red-hot Chris Pratt — whose roguish charm is surely one of the movie’s bigger marketing assets — as a boozy gambler, while the rest have been transformed into a rainbow coalition.
      Beyond the color-blind casting of Washington, the gang features a Mexican (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo), Asian (Byung-hun Lee) and a bow-slinging Native-American (Martin Sensmeier), as well as Vincent D’Onofrio as a bearded mountain man, who vaguely resembles a homicidal Santa Claus.
      That diversity would be more admirable if the casting didn’t feel as calculated as everything else about this exercise — designed to help sell the movie to different demographics and international territories. Because while there’s some playful banter among the characters, their personal stories have been largely obliterated with the exception of Hawke, whose role is a sort-of hybrid of the parts played by Robert Vaughn (the self-doubting killer) and Brad Dexter in the original.
      Inevitably, the movie spends a lot of time getting ready for the climactic showdown. But it’s so chaotic and protracted as to lose much of its punch. In addition, the body count rises to a level where it’s hard not to wonder how many casualties would have been required to earn the film an R rating instead of the less restrictive PG-13.
      The most puzzling decision, however, comes at the very end, when the filmmakers finally if fleetingly make use of Elmer Bernstein’s rousing 1960 theme, about as recognizable a piece of movie music ever written.
      For fans of the original, even a snippet of that score is welcome — if only because it signals that the movie’s over.
      “The Magnificent Seven” premieres September 23. It’s rated PG-13.

      Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/22/entertainment/magnificent-seven-review/index.html