Girls g top is featured in poster in which a boy labelled the little scholar wears a shirt bearing Albert Einsteins face

The clothing company Gap has been criticised over a new advertising campaign featuring an image of a boy, labelled the little scholar, wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with Albert Einsteins face next to a girl wearing pink who is called the social butterfly.

The ad says of the boy your future starts here, while the girls clothes are the talk of the playground. The campaign has provoked outrage, with critics describing it as sexist.

Among the detractors was the Let Toys Be Toys campaign group, which calls on companies to stop limiting childrens interests by promoting some toys and books as only suitable for girls, and others only for boys.

Let Toys Be Toys (@LetToysBeToys) July 31, 2016

For anyone who thinks that sexist marketing to children isn’t a problem… Really @UKGap ? HT @PsychScientists pic.twitter.com/BnGCQhujwG

The former childrens laureate Malorie Blackmans response to the campaign was one of many other negative reactions to it on social media. There was no immediate response from Gap.

Malorie Blackman (@malorieblackman) July 31, 2016

What the actual hell? https://t.co/l2KC8gOHUm

There have been very public campaigns to persuade toy and clothing manufacturers to abandon the stereotypes of boys as being active and clever, with girls passive and pretty.

The toy store Hamleys abandoned its pink and blue signs for boys and girls after being accused by one blogger of gender apartheid. The Pink Stinks campaign group has also successfully tackled many retailers over casual sexism, including persuading Sainsburys to stop labelling doctor costumes as for boys, and nurses and beauticians for girls.

One woman responded to Blackmans tweet about the Gap campaign by saying: That actually made me feel ill. Unbelievable. Another wrote: Where is this crap coming from? Who is driving it? My kids were born in the 80s and didnt have this.

The twin images show the girl in sparkly cat ears and a cream T-shirt with a pink g logo, while of the boy it says shirts + graphic tees = genius ideas.

Ruth Walker-Cotton pounced on a spelling mistake, tweeting: My daughter & son both love to have genius ideas please dont limit them. Ps you spelt Einstein wrong. The scientists name appears on the T-shirt spelled Einstien.

Joe Flatman tweeted to alert Gap about an ad from a commercial competitor, showing a girl with a rugby ball. He wrote: @UKGap take note: your competitor @JoJoMamanBebe gets my custom when they manage mixed-gender messages like this.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2016/aug/01/gap-accused-sexism-social-butterfly-pink-childrens-t-shirt

Its called Huel, a human fuel designed to replace natures version in a hi-tech, fuss-free, nutritionally balanced powder form. We tried it out

I have a friend around for lunch when I mix my first batch of Huel. I have laid out gzleme Turkish flatbreads stuffed with spinach and feta made fresh, minutes earlier at my local Turkish bakery, and prepared a Greek salad, bursting with tomatoes, cucumbers and parsley. Then I mix the Huel: one part powder (sorry, nutritionally complete powdered food) to five parts water. I put it into the beaker theyve provided, shake it until its mixed and then serve it in a glass.

Whats that? says the friend. That, I say, is the future of food. She sips it and makes a face. Is it supposed to taste like that? Its a good question. It claims to be vanilla flavour but its like no vanilla Ive ever tasted cloying, artificial, incredibly sweet. The texture is of a thin suspension of powdered grit in water. And then theres the aftertaste, which manages to be both sweet and bitter and lingers unpleasantly on the roof of the mouth for several minutes.

What do you think? It reminds me of the medicine I had as a child for bottom worms, she says.

Its fair to say that Im not the target market for Huel. You can perhaps divide the world into two groups of people: those who drink protein shakes for breakfast and those who dont. And I am pretty firmly in the latter. But Huel, a contraction of human fuel, is the latest in a long line of products that are tapping into the idea that food is old fashioned, inconvenient and boring, and theres a more hi-tech, whizz-bang way of delivering the same nutrients more efficiently.

The best known of these is Soylent, an American product launched in 2013, the brainchild of a 27-year-old American techie, Rob Rhinehart. He wrote a blogpost entitled How I Stopped Eating Food and kicked off what has become a multimillion-pound business.

Rhineharts idea was to strip food back to its basics. I hypothesised that the body doesnt need food itself, merely the chemicals and elements it contains, he wrote. And then he began to experiment. He bought jars of protein powders and vitamins and mixed his own nutritional brew. The result, he claimed, was that he became healthier and more energised while saving both time and money.

It was a nerdy, science-based, experimental approach to food and nutrition that found a natural home among west coast techies and its now a darling of the Silicon Valley startup scene and valued at more than $100m. According to the leading venture capitalist firm Andreessen Horowitz, which invested in Soylent, its a technology that is disrupting food; a hi-tech solution to the age-old problem: what to have for dinner.

And now theres Huel, a British version, launched last year, which claims to take a more natural approach, though the co-founder, Julian Hearn, tells me he had the idea long before Soylent burst on to the scene.

We started developing it back in 2012, which was long before Id even heard about Soylent.

Was it a bit annoying that they had beaten you to the punch? Annoying and interesting at the same time. It validated the idea that this does work. They had got a lot of interest and traction so we knew it was a goer. The downside was that it took us longer to get to market.

Julian
Julian Hearn, founder of Huel.

Hearn is something of a serial entrepreneur. He founded an internet marketing business in 2008 and sold it three years later for 2.5m. And when he came up with the idea of Huel, he was attempting to set up a comparison website for dietary programmes.

The idea was that people are never quite sure who to believe when it comes to diets. So my logic was that youd run people through different diets, would show the results and then it would be like a price comparison site. At the end, youd click on the link and would buy the programme.

But it was incredibly time-consuming and expensive to produce even one of these programmes. I was one of the guinea pigs. My goal was to go from 21% body fat to 11% body fat and it meant I had to cook all my meals from scratch and calorie-control everything. I was also eating a lot of fresh meat to get the protein, but it did work. Friends were asking me how to do it for themselves but of course theyre very busy and just dont have the time for all that. So I had the idea that there should be an easier way of getting this complete diet in a more time-saving way.

He brought in James Collier, a sports nutritionist, as a co-founder and he developed what they describe as an all-natural, vegan formula made of real food. According to the website, the ingredients include a carefully chosen blend of oats, pea protein, flaxseed, MCTs from coconut, sunflower lecithin, sea salt, a bespoke vitamin and mineral blend, vanilla flavour and a sweetener.

But when I talk to Joanna Blythman, an investigative food writer who has written five books on the food industry, she scoffs at the idea that the ingredients are natural.

There is almost nothing in there in its natural form. These are very, very technologically altered hi-tech ingredients. Theyre the opposite of what whole, natural foods are. If I read that list of ingredients on a product on a supermarket shelf, I would have a major problem.

Look at the eighth item on the ingredient list. Its called a vanilla flavour system. I mean, seriously, what is that? Its not vanilla extract or vanilla pods or vanilla grains or even vanilla essence. You are talking about the very rarified regions of food processing and industrial food chemistry where basic ingredients are being mucked around with and transformed. There are these very intense chemical sweeteners in there. Theres sucralose; thats something like 200 times sweeter than sugar. Theres maltodextrin thats another sweetener. And xylitol thats another one. Its all just rubbish. And then theres pea protein, which sounds good, doesnt it, but what the hell is it? Youre treating peas with a number of complex, chemical reactions to extract some sort of beige powder.

If I had to eat this, Id lose the will to live pretty quickly.

Shes not the only one. I have a friend to stay and in the morning I lay out muesli, yoghurt, peaches and plump ripe cherries. And then mix her a glass of Huel. And there it is again, what Ive come to think of as Huel face.

Catherine Collins, the principal dietitian at Londons St Georges Hospital NHS trust, tells me that her immediate response to the list of ingredients is that just because you can doesnt mean you should. She calls the formulation interesting and compares it to a milk-based version we use for very sick patients as a tube feed. Its what it reminds me of too Complan, the powdered sachets that my mum tried to make my dad drink when he was having chemotherapy and couldnt stomach ordinary food.

It does raise the question of why youd want to eat that when youre not desperately ill, but there are takers. On Twitter, I find a Swiss software developer, 36-year-old Nick Balestra, who tells me hes been eating nothing else for the past twoweeks.

I used to work remotely at home and I had time and all my things around me. But now Ive moved to London and its a big effort to find the time to cook in the evening and to prepare food to bring into the office. I have a very healthy lifestyle and I like eating healthily. I read about it and thought Id give it a go.

How are you finding it?

Its super good. I kind of even like the taste. Its very oaty. Its like having porridge or similar. At first, people at work looked at me like I was an alien. They were like, Are you sure? And, Do you want some normal food? But then you tell them about it, how you save time and money and how its totally healthy. I have a colleague whos a super-sporty guy and hes just ordered some. And even my girlfriend, she quite likes it.

The trick, he says, is to use less water and eat it like porridge with banana and cinnamon.

I ask Hearn about the extreme sweetness. Its very difficult to get right. Weve done research and we have an equal split of people saying its not sweet enough and those who say its too sweet. And the aftertaste? Its difficult to define. It could be the peas and rice. Its a natural, earthy taste. Or it could be sucralose, though its not really an aftertaste.

He arranges to send me the unflavoured version and suggests using a blender, making it with ice and adding coffee or fruit to it. I have one guinea pig left. My running partner, Catherine, is exactly the type of person who drinks protein shakes for breakfast. I mix two versions: one is the vanilla powder with fresh blueberries and one is the unflavoured version with a bit of honey and fresh raspberries. At the end of our run I pull them out of my rucksack.

She tries the blueberry one first. Whats in it? she says. Sucralose. Maltodextrin. And xylitol, I say. And a vanilla flavour system.

No, she says definitively and pushes it aside. But the unflavoured, unsweetened raspberry one almost passes muster. Its OK, she says, eventually. Id add more fruit and a banana, but I could drink that.

Ruby Tandoh, the MasterChef winner who wrote an influential piece earlier this year about the problematic nature of clean eating said that she believes that products like Huel are a result of the anxiety we increasingly have around food. We may want to maximise the health benefits of food, but as she points out, the research is simply not there yet and it denies the mental, emotional and social wellbeing aspects of food, and to absent yourself from that seems like a terrible self-sabotage. Were not robots: food is more than just our fuel.

According to Hearn, all this is to miss the point. The thing that most people have for breakfast is toast and thats optimised for taste. Its not optimised for nutrition. It doesnt provide everything that you need, whereas this does. Were not saying eat this instead of a nice dinner with friends. Were saying have this for breakfast or for lunch if you dont have time to prepare a perfect, balanced meal.

For Blythman, however, its very much an American corporate view of food. The minute I hear the food of the future, I groan. Its something that big venture capitalists get very excited about, like all the failed lab meat that never quite caught on.

Food is about more than food, she says its culture and civilisation and small moments of happiness in otherwise bad days.

Appetite is such a fundamental drive. Its part of what we do every day to make our lives a little bit nicer. Even if your boss is horrible or youve had a bad day, its just that little nice thing you can do for yourself. And these products just dont get that at all.

New food tech from Silicon valley

The Impossible Burger
(Meat-free burger created in a lab)

Beyond
Photograph: Beyond Meat

Vegetarian meat-substitutes have been pioneered by companies like Quorn, using fungi to make equally protein-rich alternatives. As tasty as these are, few would argue that they are indistinguishable from real meat. The American startup Impossible Foods has created a meat-free burger that it claims looks, tastes and even bleeds like real beef. The Impossible Burger contains heme, which is found in animal blood and is largely responsible for the way meat smells and tastes. Artificially produced heme is mixed with plant-based ingredients to create the eco-friendly burger; Impossible Foods says it saves water and farmland and takes 90% less greenhouse gas to produce than beefburgers. Google recently offered $300m for the company but was rejected, remaining as investors. The burger debuted in a New York restaurant last week for $12 and will soon be in supermarkets.

Just Scramble
(Egg-free scrambled eggs)

Just

Egg-free powders, used to replace eggs in vegan recipes, have been gaining popularity, but none can recreate the taste or texture of freshly cooked eggs. Hampton Creek Foods has almost finished developing Just Scramble, the worlds first plant-based substitute for scrambled eggs. Its scientists tested thousands of plants and identified chemical compounds that closely mimicked the properties of chicken eggs. Its chefs used these to create a cholesterol-free yellow liquid that can be cooked in a pan to make a quick and healthy breakfast. The product attracted a large investment from Bill Gates and impressed culinary expert Andrew Zimmern at a tasting: Youre almost there…no wonder youre so excited. The company hopes its animal-friendly egg replacements will reduce the need for battery farming. Just Scramble should be available in shops next year at a price similar to real eggs.

Soylent
(Meal replacement drink)

Soylent

Soylent, like Huel, is a meal replacement drink intended to meet all the nutritional requirements of an average adult. Rob Rhinehart, an LA software engineer and father of modern liquid meal replacements, first developed the drink in early 2013 as a personal alternative to fast food. Rhineharts blog about the success of his month-long liquid-only diet attracted so much attention that he raised $3m in crowdfunding, which he used to commercialise his creation. Soylent is available in both powder and ready-to-drink forms, the most recent formulae for which upped the proportion of eco-friendly algae to make up a third of the product.

The remainder mostly consists of the carbohydrates found in beetroot and a protein extract from soybeans, along with added vitamins and minerals. Currently, Soylent only ships to the US and Canada and costs $3 per 400-calorie bottle, but sales to other countries are coming soon.

Muufri
(Lab-grown milk)

Muufri

We already have many plant-based alternatives to cows milk (almond and soy, for example), but none tastes quite like the real thing. However, many dairy cows suffer in poor conditions to produce it. This prompted two students studying in the US to enter and win a $30,000 research competition, funding their work on Muufri, a tasty but humane milk.

In a lab in Cork, Ireland, they transferred DNA from cows into yeast cells to produce the real proteins found in cows milk. The pair then added other natural ingredients of milk such as calcium and potassium, but used a different sugar molecule to make it suitable for the lactose-intolerant. Due to the controversy and suspicion surrounding lab-grown foods, Muufri will only be unveiled when it is believed to be near-perfect. The product is expected to launch late next year, but will initially be twice as expensive as cows milk.

Mealsquares
(Scone-like meal replacement)

Meal

If instant and nutritious meals sound appealing, but the idea of drinking them doesnt, a health researchers Silicon Valley startup may have the answer. The flagship product is the Mealsquare, a scone-like creation made from minimally processed, sustainable ingredients such as sunflower seeds, oats and oranges. Each pocket-sized square contains 400 calories and is nutritionally balanced to vitamin and mineral consumption guidelines, helping to combat deficiencies and keep the body healthy. The website recommends Mealsquares as a replacement for one or two meals a day, rather than an exclusive diet, because benefits of certain foods (such as oily fish) cant be included without compromising taste. Currently, the product is available only in the US; a sample 10-pack costs $30 but an $85 subscription buys a monthly delivery of 30. The squares come individually packaged, can be heated up in a minute in the microwave and last for a month in the fridge. Will Latter

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jul/31/huel-human-fuel-hi-tech-food-powder

Looking for a truly unique getaway? Royal Caribbean now lets customers customize their own excursions to immerse themselves in local culture, cuisines and activities. The personalized touch is available in 77 countries. (Royal Caribbean International)

If theres one thing millennials love more than traveling, its bragging about the places theyve traveled to.

Whether they go on traditional cruise ships or far-flung adventures, theyre insisting on more active, immersive trips often with their kids and parents that they can brag about when they return home.

They go for the bragging rights of being the first in their circle, said Steve Cohen, who oversees the annual Portrait of American Travelers produced by MMGY Global, a travel, hospitality and entertainment marketing firm.

More than 50 percent of millennials post vacation photos on social media to make friends and family jealous, Cohen said recently at the TMS Family Travel Summit. He said nearly two-thirds of millennial families took at least one international trip in the past year, often to places theyd never seen before.

Millennial travelers are attracted to fun, fast-paced adventures that often start at the top of the bucket list, said Todd Smith, founder and president of AdventureSmith Explorations.

We often hear they are aiming to claim the bragging right of stepping foot on all seven continents before they turn 30, said Shelley Fry of Expedition Trips.

And the travel industry is changing to accommodate them. According to the Adventure Travel Trade Association, nearly 75 percent of adventure outfitters reported adding more trips for families and multigenerational groups.

Companies also are retooling their traditional itineraries to appeal to more active travelers of all ages. Oceanwide Expeditions, for example, is providing more time for climbing mountains, kayaking, glacier trekking and even camping in its popular Basecamp itinerary to Antarctica. (Costs start at just under $8,000.) 

And luxury tour provider Abercrombie & Kents Antarctica cruise has proven so popular, it has added a second departure in December at more than $40,000 for a family of four.

Traditional travelers choose Antarctica only after they have covered all other continents, Smith said, whereas millennials start with Antarctica as part of a YOLO you only live once attitude.

Lindblad Expeditions, known for its more sedate, high-end wilderness cruises and a partnership with National Geographic that attracts amateur photographers, has just introduced its most active itinerary ever Wild Alaska Escape for next summer. (Rates begin at $4,290 per person, based on double occupancy.)

AMA Waterways and Backroads, meanwhile, recently announced they are doubling their 2017 lineup of active river cruises: more than 100 sailings (starting at just under $6,000) with adventure hiking and biking tours.

Myths and Mountains has designed a Galapagos Wildlife, People and Volcanoes itinerary that includes cooking lessons from a local family, dinner with a fisherman and a challenging hike to the top of the active Sierra Negra volcano, which has the second largest caldera in the world. (Prices start at $5,195.)

Unusual experiences have special appeal like seeing the worlds rarest bear when cruising in Canadas Rainforest Fjords with Maple Leaf Adventures, or joining the crew aboard the tall ship Bark Europa, built in 1911, for the Tall Ships races in Boston and Canada next year. Sailing experience not necessary, said Managing Director Leentje Toering. And, at just over $1,600, its not all that expensive, either.

Traditional travel companies, especially cruise lines, are expanding their adventure offerings, too. As cruising has become more popular with younger guests and families, we have certainly seen an increase in popularity in soft-adventure shore excursions, said Eric Benedict, director of destination services for Norwegian Cruise Line. These days, rather than going on a bus tour, passengers may leave the ship for three days to conquer Machu Picchu in Peru, or to go kayaking in the Strait of Magellan in Chile.

Princess cruisers in Alaska can join the new Cook My Catch” program. They catch salmon and halibut on a shore excursion and bring the fish back to the ship, where it is cleaned, cooked and served at dinner.

Carnival cruisers can swim with nurse sharks off the coast of Belize or try a high-wire challenge on Grand Turk Island. And Royal Caribbean recently announced Private Journeys, which enable guests to craft personalized shore excursions, whether immersing themselves in local culture or going on a you-can-only-do-it-here adventure, like a high-adrenaline jeep tour to hidden Mayan ruins in Cozumel. 

Azamara Club Cruises promotes longer stays in port so guests can immerse themselves in the local culture.

Families and younger travelers often want to give back while on vacation, and Fathom, the pioneer in social impact travel as well as Carnival Corporations 10th and newest brand, has made that easy. On its volunteerism trips to the Dominican Republic (costs start at just $499), travelers can spend time ashore helping pour cement, planting trees or teaching Spanish. Fathom, which recently became the first American cruise line to sail to Havana in some 60 years, has also just announced an array of more immersive on-board programming.

And when you get home no matter how old you are youll be able to brag about it.

 No one I know has been here, Jacob Russell, 12, said as Fathom sailed into Havana on its inaugural cruise. Thats cool! 

Eileen Ogintz is a nationally syndicated columnist and creator of TakingtheKids.com. Her new  Kids Guide to Boston is available online and from major booksellers, along with the Kids Guides to NYC, Washington, DC, Orlando,  LA and Chicago. Coming  later this year: San Diego, San Francisco and Denver.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2016/07/29/why-modern-millennial-vacations-are-all-about-bragging-rights.html