Image copyright Getty Images

“Clean air zones” targeting drivers of high-polluting vehicles should be extended to more cities in England, the Commons environment committee has said.

MPs said more cities should get the enhanced powers being granted to London, Leeds, Birmingham, Nottingham, Derby and Southampton.

The powers allow cities to charge high-polluting vehicles to discourage them from entering the city centre.

The committee said tackling air quality was a priority.

The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs last year outlined the plans to introduce five clean air zones by 2020, after a Supreme Court ruling ordered it to comply with European Union law limits on nitrogen dioxide in the air. These five are in addition to the existing one in the capital.

The proposed clean air zones will only affect older – mainly diesel – buses, lorries, coaches and taxis, but will not apply to private cars.

Separately, London’s mayor has announced that a “ultra low emission zone” being introduced in the centre of the capital from 2020 will apply to all vehicles, including private cars.

All six cities currently granted the enhanced powers were found to have the highest levels of nitrogen dioxide.

The government said the zones would both reduce pollution in city centres and encourage the replacement of older vehicles with higher emissions.

‘Greater flexibility’

The report from the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee said emissions had been declining significantly but there were 40-50,000 early deaths each year in the UK because of cardiac, respiratory and other diseases linked to air pollution.

Committee chairman Neil Parish, the Conservative MP for Tiverton and Honiton, said: “Only five cities… will have new powers to charge polluting vehicles to enter new clean air zones.

“Councils in the dozens of other English cities currently exceeding EU pollution limits must also be given the option of using such powers if their communities support action.”

The current plans for the zones, added the report, imposed a “one size fits all” model.

It said local authorities must be given “greater flexibility in order that they can tailor measures to best meet their local circumstances.

“For example, cities may find it more effective to limit vehicle access at certain times of day or to target specific bus routes rather than adopt blanket access proposals.”


Analysis

Image copyright PA

By Roger Harrabin, BBC environment analyst

This report joins a growing body of challenge to government air pollution policy.

People are outraged by car firms cheating emissions tests. Parents are fed up of hearing their children are breathing harmful air. Campaigners are angry that ministers have tried to water down laws designed to protect public health.

And diesel drivers are annoyed at being blamed for running cars that government encouraged them to buy in the first place.

It took 400 years to clean up the capital’s air from coal smoke, according to a new book – London Fog – by Christine Corton.

The government is being pressed to act faster to solve nitrogen pollution in all the UK’s cities.

Follow Roger on Twitter


The committee also suggested:

  • The government ensure marketing claims made by vehicle manufacturers were “fully accurate”, following the scandal surrounding the falsifying of emissions by Volkswagen
  • A scrappage scheme to provide owners of diesel cars that are more than 10 years old with discounts on ultra-low emission vehicles
  • Defra investigate if it could provide incentives to the agricultural sector to reduce its contribution to air pollution

Air pollution has caught public attention by the scandal of car makers cheating emissions tests – and by successful court cases brought against the government under European law by the group ClientEarth.

Its spokesman Alan Andrews said a decision was due in weeks on further legal action on the adequacy of the government’s plan to solve the problem.

He welcomed the MPs’ report but told BBC News there was a further problem: “I can’t understand why the MPs are willing to get even tougher on drivers whilst merely advising farmers how to reduce the ammonia coming off their manure heaps.

“The pollution from farms drifts across cities and harms people’s health – there’s been barely any reduction in it for a decade, so it’s incredible that the farm lobby has managed to wriggle out of legislation.”

‘Secretive’ group

The MPs’ report says a cross-government approach is needed and calls for more action from the inter-departmental ministerial Clean Growth Group chaired by Oliver Letwin. The MPs say this group has no timetable, no minutes and needs to be less secretive.

A Defra spokesman said: “Tackling air quality is a priority for this government and our plans set out how we will achieve this through continued investment in clean technologies and by encouraging the uptake of low emission vehicles.

“Cities already have powers to introduce Clean Air Zones, and other air quality schemes, and our plans will require five cities to implement these zones…

“Later this year we will also consult on a clean air zone framework that will give local authorities the flexibility to make decisions about their own areas while ensuring a co-ordinated approach across the UK.”

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36139049

New York girl realised halfway through she was on wrong course but decided to finish anyway

A 12-year-old girl in New York has mistakenly run a half-marathon after she confused the start of the race with a five kilometre course she was supposed to be running.

LeeAdianez Rodriguez had registered for the 5km race that was part of last Sundays Rochester Regional Health Flower City Challenge. She thought she was arriving late at the starting line when the race started, so she began running with the rest of the runners.

She was supposed to run the Wegmans Family 5km, which starts on the same bridge 15 minutes after the distance runners set off.

It turned out she was running with the half-marathoners on the 13.1-mile course and not in the 5km, or 3.1 miles. Rodriguez says she realized about halfway through that she was in the wrong race but decided to finish.

She completed the half-marathon in 2:43:31.

Her mother became worried when she wasnt among the finishers of the 5K and alerted the police, who found LeeAdianez on the half-marathon course.

She just wanted to finish the race, her mother Brendalee Espada told the Democrat & Chronicle. Two hours after I started looking for her, I see that one of the officers found her. And I see she has a medal.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/27/girl-12-runs-half-marathon-by-mistake

We all want to imagine that the vehicle of the future is a solar-powered flying car or — why not? — a teleportation pad that beams us up to the mothership. But there’s a more pragmatic alternative already on the market today that clues us into what’s coming next for transportation.

It’s not quite a bike and definitely not a moped. It’s called the URB-E, and its website calls it a “folding electric scooter,” which also doesn’t totally fit. 

“We’re a new idea,” Evan Saunders, URB-E’s head of marketing, explained to The Huffington Post.

Some guys brought in recyclable electric folding bikes, so we rode them.

A video posted by Alexander C. Kaufman (@alexanderckaufman) on Apr 20, 2016 at 6:37am PDT

Saunders was doing his job well, speaking in detail about why the zippy not-a-bike has such an appeal. URB-E is electric and charges in normal wall outlets. It folds up and weighs 35 pounds, so you can carry it into your home when not in use. While it starts at a hefty $1,499.99, financing plans make it feasible for normal people to get one. The seat is pretty easy to balance on and ride, even for first-timers. (I wobbled a bit, as you can see above.) And it deliberately tops out at 15 miles an hour, so you don’t need a license to ride it, per federal law. Double-check your state laws, though, as there are varying regulations for vehicles like this.

The Verge, writing about URB-E last December, called it “the ultimate hipster dad chariot,” which might be true but misses the bigger point. The vehicle won a “silver” Edison Award Thursday for innovation in the urban mobility category, and its potential is considerably larger than serving well-off parents in cities like New York and Portland. The URB-E, or something like it, could be a neat solution to emerging global transportation problems.

Those problems hinge on a simple fact: The world’s population is becoming more concentrated in cities. As former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg pointed out in a conference last week, we’re approaching a time when 70 percent of all people live in urban areas. Meanwhile, more people are expected to enter the global middle class in the next couple of decades, and those people — analysts say — will want to purchase cars. That’s a problem for a few reasons: Cars take up a lot of space, they’re bad for the environment and they’re inefficient, burning through energy while sitting in traffic just to move one person from point A to B.

Cities, with their networks of roads and high-rise buildings, aren’t easy to change, so transportation might have to. A report published late last year by the McKinsey Center for Business and Environment suggests a couple of core solutions: Ride-sharing services like UberPool and more efficient public transit.

McKinsey
A table from McKinsey’s report illustrates some of the ways traditional models could be upended by new technology.

A vehicle like the URB-E is relevant because it could make those solutions even more efficient. 

“It was created to solve pain points in urban environments,” Saunders told HuffPost. “[It’s] the last-mile solution.”

You can easily put the URB-E in the trunk of a car or carry it with you on public transit — which isn’t always the case with normal bicycles. If you live in or near an urban area and can travel to the city center on public transportation, then the URB-E will allow you to drive the rest of the way to your office without physical exertion and without filling a gas tank. When you get to work, you can plug the vehicle into a normal outlet, and it’ll have a full charge before lunchtime.

And the URB-E is a relatively guilt-free purchase. They’re built in California and deliberately manufactured to be fully recyclable.

“We need this material,” Saunders told HuffPost. “All of this we can reuse.” In other words, URB-Es can be broken down to build other URB-Es.

You can learn more about the vehicle and — if you’re ready to take the $1,500 plunge — order one at urb-e.com.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2016/04/20/urb-e-electric-scooter_n_9773170.html