Solange Knowles was reportedly pelted with limes by white people at a Kraftwerk gig for being an outsider. I feel white micro-aggressions like that every day, says publicist Michelle Kambasha

In 2013, the good people at US-based independent label Secretly Group hired me as a fresh-faced, straight-out-of-the-Midlands graduate.

Three years later, my face is less fresh as I find myself holed up in sweaty east London pub-cum-venue most nights, waiting for bands to start, often 15 minutes after their agreed set time. In those 15 minutes, the smell of cheap alcohol becomes neutralised and I chat to the journalists Ive invited along, trying to be as friendly as possible in the hope that my charm will sway them into giving my band a four-star review that doesnt feature any complaints about technical difficulties.

In the few short minutes before the band comes on, the stage lights illuminate the crowd. Its only then I become aware that I am a black woman in an overwhelmingly white place. Im probably the only black woman here, Ill think, and suddenly the whole place feels like an anxiety dream in which I turn up to work completely naked and call my boss Mum.

This feeling of outsiderness is something Solange Knowles recently experienced at a Kraftwerk gig, along with her black husband, black child and childs friend. She claims she was targeted by a group of four white women who shouted at her to sit down, before they threw half-eaten limes at her. In response to this incident, Knowles wrote an essay about isolation, describing the experience of being a person of colour in predominately white spaces.

Ive never been pelted with limes but during my time in the music industry Ive felt the white micro-aggressions that speak far louder than words. Never misjudge my intuition in knowing that when a white, east London Corbynista with a serious case of vocal fry asks me a question like: Whys there no toilet roll? what that actually means is: I take it you work here because youre black? Or when Im asked: Why are you at this [insert any indie band] show? and I explain that its because I do their press, I know what theyre really asking is: Why dont you do press for someone black, because youre black? It is as if my race inherently makes me underqualified.

Its not like I didnt know what I was getting into. My love for alternative music started as teenager in the midst of an identity crises. As one of few black people in my school, and as a black girl who read alternative music magazines but never saw any black girls in them, I found solace in reading the works of black writers who wrote about the music I loved.

One was Britt Julious. While all of her writing is phenomenal, one article in particular resonated with me when I became a music publicist. Following an incident in which she was asked Whats a black girl doing here? at in indiepop show, it led to a deeper exploration of what it means to be black and breaching the boundaries. This birthed Blackfork her annual headcount of black people she sees at Pitchfork festival, Chicago.

A friend and I did a similar thing at NOS Primavera Sound this year (we counted seven to 12 black people, including myself, across two days). The annual count has nothing to do with the festival itself, Julious says. I do not fault Pitchfork for creating the audience that it does. Rather, this was about what it means to be black and whether or not I was fitting in.

How then do I forge my sense of belonging and find a way to become indispensable in a white world that seeks to dispose non-white people for its survival without losing who I am? How to own my black woman-ness, without feeling alone or defeated? What does my existence mean, right now, at this indie show with a crowd thats 95% white? My parents never shied away from the difficulties they faced in the corporate world: for them, speaking their mind was an aggression, whereas for white people it was just an opinion. Silence and subservience wont help me because the issue is my mere occupation in their space in the world of media and arts. So Ill continue to reply to micro-aggressions with my very own (Why dont you ask someone that works here? normally works). Ill continue to go to alternative shows right until the Tories shut every single venue down.

Ill make no apologies for who I am, and for being where Im meant to be. Stood in a sweaty east London pub-cum-venue, waiting 15 minutes for a band to start.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2016/sep/14/michelle-kambasha-why-i-do-belong-as-a-black-woman-in-the-white-world-of-indie

Olive Garden’s Never Ending Pasta Pass is going on sale Thursday. (Olive Garden)

In celebration of the 21st anniversary of its Never Ending Pasta Bowl promotion, Olive Garden is selling 21,000 passes– or however many of the highly coveted cards it can in one hour– this year. Thats more than 10 times the amount the restaurant sold in the deal last September.

In 2015 2,000 Never Ending Pasta Passes were claimed in less than one second.

Yes, just one second.

This year, however, the restaurant is giving more guests the opportunity to get an all-access pass to consume seven weeks of never ending soup, salad, breadsticks, soda and of course its pasta. Starting on Thursday, Sept. 15 at 2 p.m. ET, the new round of passes will be available for one hour on the Olive Garden website.

Each pass is $100.  

Within seconds of last years Pasta Pass sale beginning, our most enthusiastic fans clicked purchase, becoming part of an exclusive club and the envy of pasta lovers everywhere, said Jose Duenas, executive vice president of marketing for Olive Garden, in a press release.

We know there are more fans than there were Pasta Passes, Duenas said, so were expanding the club tenfold to give more guests an all-access pass to our most popular promotion of the year.

Pasta fans are already flipping over the greater odds of snagging a pass this year.

From Oct. 3 through Nov. 20, every pass holder dining at the restaurant will have access to all he or she can eat. Guests without a Pasta Pass, meanwhile, can take part in a Never Ending Pasta Bowl and enjoy unlimited pasta starting at $9.99 throughout the seven-week promotion.

The highly coveted passes spawned plenty of eBay business deals. In 2014, a black market emerged in response to the demand for the passes. Dozens of listings popped up with offers that were marked up nearly 400 percent– which is still a good deal for those who want to dine at the Italian American chain every day. 

At the time, Olive Garden argued that the passes could not be resold. The passes are personalized with the original purchasers name so that they cannot be used by anyone else (although they can take advantage of the free sodas). With tens of thousands of more passes available this year, however, the pasta pass will be hard to ignore.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2016/09/13/olive-garden-to-sell-more-than-20000-pasta-passes/

There are many reasons to love The Great British Bake Off, but if you’re an advertiser it has something very few programmes can offer: Five million viewers under the age of 34.

For a programme aimed at a channel whose viewers have an average age of 62, and featuring a judge in her 80s, this is more than remarkable.

Bake Off was described as “quintessentially BBC” by the corporation and its formula, in which nice people cope with some mild pastry-related jeopardy, contradicts almost every expert opinion about what young people want to watch.

The BBC’s other big ratings warhorse, Strictly Come Dancing, has a two-to-one split between those over and under 45. Bake Off is one-to-one.

Who would have dared say 10 years ago that the way to reach “Millennials” was baking?

So, it’s no wonder that a rival broadcaster has swooped. That demographic is marketing catnip.

‘Power shift’

The company that makes the programme, Love Productions, says it’s not just about money, but money certainly played a part.

The BBC’s guidelines on how much of its licence fee it is willing to pay for a factual programme like the Bake Off has an upper limit of around 300,000.

In the end the BBC offered 500,000 an hour for 30 hours of programming, totalling 15m.

It was 10m too little.


Image caption Mel and Sue have now said they will not move with the show to Channel 4

There are also other issues. In the past both Jamie Oliver and Michel Roux found life easier on Channel 4, thanks to the BBC’s rules on commercial activities. A move to Channel 4 will open up a wider range of money-making ventures for Bake Off’s creators.

For example: The BBC, under pressure from the Government, recently curtailed its commercial activities when it came to recipes. Channel 4 faces fewer such pressures.

The problem for Channel 4 is preserving the magic formula. Just as no one would have predicted the success of the original programme, no one can be sure if the public will stay with the show. TV history is littered with examples of presenters and programmes that have collapsed like a souffle after switching sides.

Secondly, it is clear the presenters had no idea that the programme was going to move to Channel 4. The network says it does not want to change the format in any way but that will now be a matter of negotiation. That then takes us on to a third point – summarised by a former Chief Executive of Channel 4, Sir Michael Grade.

Media captionLord Grade says Channel 4 “shot itself very seriously in the foot” buying Bake Off

“Channel 4 has shot itself very seriously in the foot,” was his comment on Tuesday.

His concern is that the broadcaster is in the midst of its own battle with the government in which it is fending off the threat of privatisation. One of its core arguments is that it is a developer of new shows, a place that gives the public output that other broadcasters avoid.

Snaffling a much-loved programme from the BBC and promising to leave it intact is something that he feels undermines that argument. Whatever Channel 4 now does, the conversation will revolve around the Bake Off.

But of course, this not just a battle between channels. It’s a reflection of how much TV has changed over the years.

The Great British Bake Off may feel “quintessentially BBC” but it is the product of a firm that is 70% owned by Sky, part of Rupert Murdoch’s broadcasting empire.

The other big food programme on BBC One is Masterchef, again a Murdoch product, via his 50% ownership of production company Shine.

The BBC owns and reaps the rewards for a number of programmes such as Strictly Come Dancing, Top Gear and Doctor Who but it is also obliged to buy a lot of its output from independent producers.

That other midweek ratings winner for the BBC, The Apprentice, is a US-owned product made by a firm called Boundless, which is part of the RTL group.

There has been a shift in global power from channels to the international production companies who place their programmes wherever they can make the best return and it is a process that’s only going to continue if audiences for the big traditional channels continues to decline.


Follow us on Twitter @BBCNewsEnts, on Instagram, or if you have a story suggestion email entertainment.news@bbc.co.uk.

Related Topics

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-37353262